Well, with the large absolute expansion speed that my work has proved exists through aberration, I'm just 2.5% above Riess's estimation range... however, when one considers that part of this would be gobbled up, by some of what is already known about the background cosmic microwave radiation movement: I would probably fall right into Riess's range!
Furthermore, the much lower speed of light that's currently in acceptance - i.e. the relative speed - is conducive to giving rise to the figmentary artefact of a present acceleration, because the light years traveled outwards would not appear linear!
In conclusion one must ask oneself: is it reasonable to embark on the ridiculously incredible, when the answer is right in front of us: logically developed from stellar aberration and the Michelson-Morley... I think Not!
Frank Pio Russo.